<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Order Kamagra Effervescent Online No Prescription - Reliable Online DrugStore</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scenariogirl.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scenariogirl.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 01:49:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Order Kamagra Effervescent Online No Prescription - Reliable Online DrugStore</title>
		<link>http://scenariogirl.com/usability/5-minutes-of-captioning-for-5-bucks/comment-page-1/#comment-2431</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa Herrod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 01:49:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scenariogirl.com/?p=176#comment-2431</guid>
		<description>Oh sorry! I&#039;ll update the post :)

Great to hear from you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh sorry! I&#8217;ll update the post :)</p>
<p>Great to hear from you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Order Kamagra Effervescent Online No Prescription - Reliable Online DrugStore</title>
		<link>http://scenariogirl.com/usability/5-minutes-of-captioning-for-5-bucks/comment-page-1/#comment-2427</link>
		<dc:creator>Soliloquy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2010 04:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scenariogirl.com/?p=176#comment-2427</guid>
		<description>So this is where all those visits came from!  Thanks for helping to spread the word.  I&#039;m a PWD myself due to neuromuscular disease and may need those captions myself someday, so I&#039;m glad to be doing my part to make the web more accessible for everyone now.

(Though I am a her, not a him.  Ambiguous Internet handles ahoy!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So this is where all those visits came from!  Thanks for helping to spread the word.  I&#8217;m a PWD myself due to neuromuscular disease and may need those captions myself someday, so I&#8217;m glad to be doing my part to make the web more accessible for everyone now.</p>
<p>(Though I am a her, not a him.  Ambiguous Internet handles ahoy!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Order Kamagra Effervescent Online No Prescription - Reliable Online DrugStore</title>
		<link>http://scenariogirl.com/accessibility/is-javascript-accessible-for-assistive-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-2412</link>
		<dc:creator>Christophe Strobbe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 16:38:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scenariogirl.com/?p=348#comment-2412</guid>
		<description>@Brian,
How does pressure on AT vendors help users who don&#039;t have the money to buy a newer version of their AT?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Brian,<br />
How does pressure on AT vendors help users who don&#8217;t have the money to buy a newer version of their AT?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Order Kamagra Effervescent Online No Prescription - Reliable Online DrugStore</title>
		<link>http://scenariogirl.com/awareness/the-web-is-a-waste-of-time/comment-page-1/#comment-2225</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa Herrod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 03:59:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scenariogirl.com/?p=354#comment-2225</guid>
		<description>I know, it&#039;s quite surprising. What&#039;s wrong with good old HTML?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know, it&#8217;s quite surprising. What&#8217;s wrong with good old HTML?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Order Kamagra Effervescent Online No Prescription - Reliable Online DrugStore</title>
		<link>http://scenariogirl.com/awareness/the-web-is-a-waste-of-time/comment-page-1/#comment-2133</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 04:49:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scenariogirl.com/?p=354#comment-2133</guid>
		<description>and they put this report out on a Pdf? (shakes head)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and they put this report out on a Pdf? (shakes head)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Order Kamagra Effervescent Online No Prescription - Reliable Online DrugStore</title>
		<link>http://scenariogirl.com/events/sydney-web-accessibility-inclusive-design-meetup/comment-page-1/#comment-1998</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruth Ellison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Oct 2010 12:11:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scenariogirl.com/?p=361#comment-1998</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s fantastic! As I&#039;ll be visiting Sydney that week, I&#039;m hoping to visit the meetup, even though I&#039;m not a Sydney-sider.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s fantastic! As I&#8217;ll be visiting Sydney that week, I&#8217;m hoping to visit the meetup, even though I&#8217;m not a Sydney-sider.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Order Kamagra Effervescent Online No Prescription - Reliable Online DrugStore</title>
		<link>http://scenariogirl.com/accessibility/ozewai-web-accessibility-conference-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-1878</link>
		<dc:creator>scenariogirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 00:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scenariogirl.com/?p=340#comment-1878</guid>
		<description>Hey Jonathan, thanks for asking. Of course that&#039;s fine :) 

I can&#039;t wait for the conference!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Jonathan, thanks for asking. Of course that&#8217;s fine :) </p>
<p>I can&#8217;t wait for the conference!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Order Kamagra Effervescent Online No Prescription - Reliable Online DrugStore</title>
		<link>http://scenariogirl.com/accessibility/ozewai-web-accessibility-conference-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-1877</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan O'Donnell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 00:05:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scenariogirl.com/?p=340#comment-1877</guid>
		<description>Hi Lisa

I would like to use your comments about OZeWAI to encourage people to attend.

For example, when listing the event on LinkedIn, I&#039;d like to start the description this way:

&quot;OZeWAI is a really fantastic web accessibility conference that covers a broad range of topics suitable for a whole range of web practitioners from developers, to designers, UX practitioners and of course anyone interested in creating a more accessible web.&quot; – ScenarioGirl*

Since LinkedIn doesn&#039;t allow HTML in the description, at the end of the description, I would add:
* ScenarioGirl&#039;s review of OZeWAI can be found at:
http://scenariogirl.com/accessibility/ozewai-web-accessibility-conference-2010/

I&#039;d do something similar when listing it as an event on FaceBook.

What do you think?
Jonathan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Lisa</p>
<p>I would like to use your comments about OZeWAI to encourage people to attend.</p>
<p>For example, when listing the event on LinkedIn, I&#8217;d like to start the description this way:</p>
<p>&#8220;OZeWAI is a really fantastic web accessibility conference that covers a broad range of topics suitable for a whole range of web practitioners from developers, to designers, UX practitioners and of course anyone interested in creating a more accessible web.&#8221; – ScenarioGirl*</p>
<p>Since LinkedIn doesn&#8217;t allow HTML in the description, at the end of the description, I would add:<br />
* ScenarioGirl&#8217;s review of OZeWAI can be found at:<br />
<a href="http://scenariogirl.com/accessibility/ozewai-web-accessibility-conference-2010/" rel="nofollow">http://scenariogirl.com/accessibility/ozewai-web-accessibility-conference-2010/</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;d do something similar when listing it as an event on FaceBook.</p>
<p>What do you think?<br />
Jonathan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Order Kamagra Effervescent Online No Prescription - Reliable Online DrugStore</title>
		<link>http://scenariogirl.com/accessibility/is-javascript-accessible-for-assistive-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-1817</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Barber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Sep 2010 14:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scenariogirl.com/?p=348#comment-1817</guid>
		<description>@jessica considering the &quot;new specific question&quot; the answer is yes.  There are a number of documented techniques in making lightboxes and show/hide questions for forms using javascript.  These are not just theoretical solutions they are practical and fully tested solutions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@jessica considering the &#8220;new specific question&#8221; the answer is yes.  There are a number of documented techniques in making lightboxes and show/hide questions for forms using javascript.  These are not just theoretical solutions they are practical and fully tested solutions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Order Kamagra Effervescent Online No Prescription - Reliable Online DrugStore</title>
		<link>http://scenariogirl.com/accessibility/is-javascript-accessible-for-assistive-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-1755</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 12:19:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scenariogirl.com/?p=348#comment-1755</guid>
		<description>Web standards such as the DOM were developed in order to enable more richly interactive and usable interfaces.  Unfortunately some Assistive  Technologies fail to provide adequate support for manipulation of HTML elements - just as IE 6 fails to support HTML &amp; CSS adequately. But we don&#039;t use IE 6&#039;s failure as a stick to beat HTML and CSS developments, do we?  If AT fail to support JavaScript (and the User Agent Accessibility Guielines) then we should be putting pressures on the vendors.  Of course the JavaScript, just like the HTML and CSS, needs to be implemented correctly. 

So in answer to your question, JavaScript can be accessible to users of correctly functioning Assistive Technologies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Web standards such as the DOM were developed in order to enable more richly interactive and usable interfaces.  Unfortunately some Assistive  Technologies fail to provide adequate support for manipulation of HTML elements &#8211; just as IE 6 fails to support HTML &amp; CSS adequately. But we don&#8217;t use IE 6&#8242;s failure as a stick to beat HTML and CSS developments, do we?  If AT fail to support JavaScript (and the User Agent Accessibility Guielines) then we should be putting pressures on the vendors.  Of course the JavaScript, just like the HTML and CSS, needs to be implemented correctly. </p>
<p>So in answer to your question, JavaScript can be accessible to users of correctly functioning Assistive Technologies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Order Kamagra Effervescent Online No Prescription - Reliable Online DrugStore</title>
		<link>http://scenariogirl.com/accessibility/is-javascript-accessible-for-assistive-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-1718</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessica Enders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 05:41:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scenariogirl.com/?p=348#comment-1718</guid>
		<description>@Christophe I agree with you that the question is fundamentally wrong (even though I asked it!). It would be more correct if I had said:
&lt;q&gt;Can you code a form to use elements like lightboxes, show/hide of questions within the same page etc and still be accessible to people using Assistive Technology, *without* a non-JavaScript gracefully degraded version?&lt;/q&gt;
Any thoughts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Christophe I agree with you that the question is fundamentally wrong (even though I asked it!). It would be more correct if I had said:<br />
<q>Can you code a form to use elements like lightboxes, show/hide of questions within the same page etc and still be accessible to people using Assistive Technology, *without* a non-JavaScript gracefully degraded version?</q><br />
Any thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Order Kamagra Effervescent Online No Prescription - Reliable Online DrugStore</title>
		<link>http://scenariogirl.com/accessibility/is-javascript-accessible-for-assistive-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-1642</link>
		<dc:creator>Christophe Strobbe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 15:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scenariogirl.com/?p=348#comment-1642</guid>
		<description>The question: &quot;Is JavaScript accessible?&quot; is just wrong. To generalise this: all questions that ask: &quot;Is technology X accessible?&quot; are wrong. Technologies in general can be used in accessible and in inaccessible ways. This is why WCAG 2.0 uses the phrase &quot;accessibility-supported *ways* of using technologies&quot; instead of &quot;accessibility-supported technologies&quot;. Even when users have the latest and greatest version of browser X and screen reader Y, technologies can be used in ways that cause accessibility issues. By the way, progressive enhancement does not solve this issue when users don&#039;t know how to turn off JavaScript (which is probably most users), so a developer can&#039;t hide behind the concept of &quot;progressive enhancement&quot; when he has created an inaccessible JavaScript-based user interface.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The question: &#8220;Is JavaScript accessible?&#8221; is just wrong. To generalise this: all questions that ask: &#8220;Is technology X accessible?&#8221; are wrong. Technologies in general can be used in accessible and in inaccessible ways. This is why WCAG 2.0 uses the phrase &#8220;accessibility-supported *ways* of using technologies&#8221; instead of &#8220;accessibility-supported technologies&#8221;. Even when users have the latest and greatest version of browser X and screen reader Y, technologies can be used in ways that cause accessibility issues. By the way, progressive enhancement does not solve this issue when users don&#8217;t know how to turn off JavaScript (which is probably most users), so a developer can&#8217;t hide behind the concept of &#8220;progressive enhancement&#8221; when he has created an inaccessible JavaScript-based user interface.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Order Kamagra Effervescent Online No Prescription - Reliable Online DrugStore</title>
		<link>http://scenariogirl.com/accessibility/is-javascript-accessible-for-assistive-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-1640</link>
		<dc:creator>Denis Boudreau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 14:55:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scenariogirl.com/?p=348#comment-1640</guid>
		<description>Yes, it CAN be if used in a way that&#039;s compatible with Assistive technologies. But it&#039;s rarely the case, unfortunately.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, it CAN be if used in a way that&#8217;s compatible with Assistive technologies. But it&#8217;s rarely the case, unfortunately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Order Kamagra Effervescent Online No Prescription - Reliable Online DrugStore</title>
		<link>http://scenariogirl.com/accessibility/is-javascript-accessible-for-assistive-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-1633</link>
		<dc:creator>Iza Bartosiewicz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 07:55:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scenariogirl.com/?p=348#comment-1633</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been keeping an eye on a WebAIM blog post, which sparked an interesting discussion on this very issue: http://webaim.org/blog/javascript-as-an-accessibility-concern/

According to the WebAIM&#039;s 2009 survey of screen reader users, 74.9% have the JavaScript enabled, but 10.4% admitted to having the JavaScript disabled in their browser, while 14.7% weren&#039;t sure: http://webaim.org/projects/screenreadersurvey2/#javascript

The conclusion was that, since the majority of users have the JavaScript enabled, accessible scripting techniques must be used. No argument here; However, I think 10.4% is still a considerable number, and if we add those who may not have a choice in this matter (corporate policy, mobile devices), it is worth ensuring that basic functionality is provided if scripts are not available.

@Jessica The &#039;Usable and Accessible Form Validation and Error Recovery&#039; article might be of help: http://webaim.org/techniques/formvalidation/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been keeping an eye on a WebAIM blog post, which sparked an interesting discussion on this very issue: <a href="http://webaim.org/blog/javascript-as-an-accessibility-concern/" rel="nofollow">http://webaim.org/blog/javascript-as-an-accessibility-concern/</a></p>
<p>According to the WebAIM&#8217;s 2009 survey of screen reader users, 74.9% have the JavaScript enabled, but 10.4% admitted to having the JavaScript disabled in their browser, while 14.7% weren&#8217;t sure: <a href="http://webaim.org/projects/screenreadersurvey2/#javascript" rel="nofollow">http://webaim.org/projects/screenreadersurvey2/#javascript</a></p>
<p>The conclusion was that, since the majority of users have the JavaScript enabled, accessible scripting techniques must be used. No argument here; However, I think 10.4% is still a considerable number, and if we add those who may not have a choice in this matter (corporate policy, mobile devices), it is worth ensuring that basic functionality is provided if scripts are not available.</p>
<p>@Jessica The &#8216;Usable and Accessible Form Validation and Error Recovery&#8217; article might be of help: <a href="http://webaim.org/techniques/formvalidation/" rel="nofollow">http://webaim.org/techniques/formvalidation/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Order Kamagra Effervescent Online No Prescription - Reliable Online DrugStore</title>
		<link>http://scenariogirl.com/accessibility/is-javascript-accessible-for-assistive-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-1632</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Broyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 07:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scenariogirl.com/?p=348#comment-1632</guid>
		<description>The fact that someone like T.V. Raman uses web apps such as GMail, Google Reader, Google Calendar, etc. implies the answer to your question is &quot;yes!&quot;

See http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2008/03/aria-for-google-reader-in-praise-of.html and http://www.google.com/accessibility/resources.html (among others)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fact that someone like T.V. Raman uses web apps such as GMail, Google Reader, Google Calendar, etc. implies the answer to your question is &#8220;yes!&#8221;</p>
<p>See <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2008/03/aria-for-google-reader-in-praise-of.html" rel="nofollow">http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2008/03/aria-for-google-reader-in-praise-of.html</a> and <a href="http://www.google.com/accessibility/resources.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/accessibility/resources.html</a> (among others)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

